Jump to content

Talk:Ethanol fuel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeEthanol fuel was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 12, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed

By volume or by weight

[edit]

When discussing the percents mixtures, may I suggest that you editors be more explicit and specify percent by volume or by weight. --JohnHerbster — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnHerbster (talkcontribs) 17:22, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Ethanol fuel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:03, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Energy Balance

[edit]

Dear All,

The energy balance quoted in this article is based on a single source (National Geographic Article) and may not be accurate as there are other sources (USDA and published scientific papers) that give different numbers. I propose to update this, maybe in a week or two, if there are no objections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.206.125.120 (talk) 17:43, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 17 external links on Ethanol fuel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:23, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ethanol fuel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:01, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cellulosic ethanol

[edit]

The article’s references to cellulosic ethanol frame it as a subject of contemporary research and interest. I find this framing somewhat problematic as the references cited on the subject are from 2009 or earlier. Is it valid to indicate cellulosic ethanol science as the current state of research when references are more than 10 years old?

Hithigon (talk) 00:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. Please see the updated section. Sandcherry (talk) 17:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


The environmental implications are not fully discussed. Many sources suggest it is not a net benefit, and may be an actual harm, and that’s without considering the vast amount of natural wilderness lost or potentially lost to farmland, a very big harm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:645:C601:6010:8937:1975:D181:D614 (talk) 00:46, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]