Talk:Alabama paradox

This is the talk page of a redirect that has been merged and now targets the page:
• Apportionment paradox
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Apportionment paradox
Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions.

Alabama

This redirect is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama

U.S. Congress

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
	This redirect is about one (or many) event(s).

United States: Government

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government.

untitled

I'd like to point out that the example is flawed, as the fair share is slightly off for the 69-seat case.

I have fiddled with some numbers in Excel and have come up with another example. I'll be changing the example in the article. LuckyWizard 06:56, 31 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand.

The problem states that the paradox is a result of a larger size but the example shows a result of more seats and not a larger size. Can this be clarified? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.49.184.29 (talk) 00:11, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did you think "larger size" meant the population of the state? It means the number of seats in the legislature. —Tamfang (talk) 18:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was merge into Apportionment paradox. -- Tklalmighty (talk) 03:05, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am merging this page into Apportionment paradox. Tklalmighty (talk) 03:05, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

What?

You call that a "discussion", opened and closed at the same time? —Tamfang (talk) 07:15, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]