Talk:Verisign
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Verisign article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Verisign was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Linking issue
[edit]"More information on the .net bidding process is available at ICANN." If this is referring to the page ICANN, it probably breaks something on MOS, and also I cannot find a mention of the .net bidding process on the page ICANN. Dialmayo (talk) (Contribs) she/her 15:02, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- Former good article nominees
- C-Class company articles
- Mid-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class Internet articles
- Low-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- C-Class Virginia articles
- Low-importance Virginia articles
- WikiProject Virginia articles
- C-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- C-Class Computer networking articles
- Low-importance Computer networking articles
- C-Class Computer networking articles of Low-importance
- All Computer networking articles
- C-Class Computer Security articles
- Mid-importance Computer Security articles
- C-Class Computer Security articles of Mid-importance
- All Computer Security articles
- All Computing articles