This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

This section is an archive of the discussion surrounding a page which was kept following no consensus on VfD

I have had it with this in-DUH-vidual. These TV and movie sub-stubs which are devoid of content come in on a daily basis but from different IPs, maybe from a library. All have the same attributes, namely the article's title being repeated in the edit summary, verb tense conflicts and no more information other than a brief cast list or credits. I've tried to contact this person...no response. I've voted speedy delete...and have been asked to bring the debate here. I've listed these on the RC Patrol page as well. I'm not all bad as I've tried to edit a few. So have other users, to their infinite credit. Still, I feel that ALL of these should be speedy deleted on the same grounds as the Guelph botany department article. - Lucky 6.9 00:39, 3 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Delete. Acegikmo1 02:37, 3 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete -- Chris 73 | Talk 04:18, 3 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I'd say keep--even these sub-stubs are better than no article at all. Agreed, however, that the person who adds them should include more info and format it correctly. Meelar 04:21, 3 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Better than nothing. Everyking 04:26, 3 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Subtrivial, complete waste of time & resources. Wile E. Heresiarch 06:46, 3 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete if not expanded to a decent stub. -- Cyrius|✎ 06:59, 3 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I would not mind if these were deleted on sight. If this contributer wants it included then he should at least write a proper stub. Thue 09:19, 3 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Keep - Current stub looks good. Since the current entry shows lengthy filmography I don't see a reason to delete just because the initial user did a poor job. - Tεx τ urε 15:36, 3 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I've made a good faith effort to expand the stub a bit myself. Looks good in its current form. - Lucky 6.9 16:05, 3 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Keep. I agree that the substubs are annoying, but instead of listing them here, list them on Cleanup. RickK 19:43, Jun 3, 2004 (UTC)
- "Cleanup" it shall be. Two more of these came in, namely Rob Roy (movie) and Fluke (movie), but I fixed them myself. If ya can't beat 'em, join 'em, right? - Lucky 6.9 20:35, 3 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Keep. If legit, a decent filmography. Maybe she has a literate fan or two who'd flesh out a stub.Denn i 02:34, 2004 Jun 9 (UTC)

Shayna from Canada?

Am not aware of anything to back this up. Source? - knoodelhed 04:19, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)

According to TvTome[1] she was born in Brantford, Brant County, Ontario, Canada.—Rory ☺ 12:52, Aug 31, 2004 (UTC)

Original Research?

I added a picture and started a biography: I figured, as long as I have a friend on Wikipedia, I should expand her article. But does entering information I know about her from knowing her count as Original Research? Would it help if i put it first on my own website, and then sited that as a reference? That sounds a little silly though.--Yak314 20:56, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]