Talk:2600

On 6 September 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved to 2600 (disambiguation). The result of the discussion was not moved.

Untitled

Simplified stub, added stub msg, and ital. disambig. msg. blankfaze | &#9835 04:13, 25 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 September 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 12:51, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2600 → 2600 (disambiguation) – The page "2600" should redirect to 3rd millennium#26th century. 176.88.28.90 (talk) 12:33, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per the other RMs, no evidence is provided by the nomination that readers want a completely empty section above all else. Years that are hundreds of years away are not usually the primary topic because we are not Nostradamus. Nohomersryan (talk) 16:29, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. There is nothing specific to be said about the year, so it cannot be primary. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. No primary topic for this term, and especially not a topic comprising 1% of an empty section. Certes (talk) 00:14, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.