Jump to content

User talk:Max rspct

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

>>PLEASE LEAVE YOUR MESSAGES AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE>>>>

the Moon
4th quarter, 2%

User talk:Max rspct/archive1 (25th Nov 2004 - 31st Oct 2005)

User talk:Max rspct/archive2 (1st Nov 2005 - 25th Nov 2005)

User talk:Max rspct/archive3 (28th Nov 2005 - 10th Dec 2005)

User talk:Max rspct/archive4 (11th Dec 2005 - 13th Dec 2005)

User talk:Max rspct/archive5 (13th Dec 2005- 12th April 2006)

User talk:Max rspct/archive6 (15th April 2006 - 19th May 2006)

User talk:Max rspct/archive7 (24th May 2006 - 25th June 2006)

User talk:Max rspct/archive8 (26th June 2006 - 1st November 2007)

User talk:Max rspct/archive9 (5th Nov 2007 - 14th April 2008)




We are the music makers,
And we are the dreamers of dreams,
Wandering by lone sea-breakers,
And sitting by desolate streams;—
World-losers and world-forsakers,
On whom the pale moon gleams:
Yet we are the movers and shakers
Of the world for ever, it seems.

Ode, Arthur O'Shaughnessy


O child Anarchia, infinite promise
infinite carefulness
I listen, listen in the night
by the cradle deep as the night
is it well with the child?

The Dispossessed








RJ11 Sock Puppet is Back

[edit]
The RJII sock-puppet is back. His account he's using now is: Operation_Spooner -Radical Mallard, July 20, 2008, 2:16 PM
[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Honecker.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:55, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Almasy06.jpg}

[edit]

Thank you for uploading Image:Almasy06.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Almasy07.jpg}

[edit]

Thank you for uploading Image:Almasy07.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter June 2008

[edit]

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter June 2008

--Chef Tanner (talk) 17:03, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In light of the fact that it is the first book the U.S. government ever went to court to censor before its publication(!), I was hoping you could help improve the The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence article as part of an effort to make it worthy of becoming a featured article candidate? --Loremaster (talk) 14:10, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter July 2008

[edit]

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter July 2008

--Chef Tanner (talk) 15:56, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mysterious deaths of GEC-Marconi scientists, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Vassyana (talk) 05:59, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of GEC-Marconi scientist deaths conspiracy theory

[edit]

I have nominated GEC-Marconi scientist deaths conspiracy theory, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GEC-Marconi scientist deaths conspiracy theory. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Verbal chat 16:33, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Muttawakil bbc.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Muttawakil bbc.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 14:02, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Almasy07.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Almasy07.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:25, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Eppler stanstede.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Eppler stanstede.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:26, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Almasy06.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Almasy06.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:27, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dawsonfieldcamels.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dawsonfieldcamels.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:35, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Max. Would you like to add some input to this Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2008 August 29#Image:Dawsonfieldcamels.jpg|discussion]]? Thanks, --Damiens.rf 15:17, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nick de toit.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Nick de toit.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:38, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Orang4.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Orang4.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:39, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

[edit]

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 22:59, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter

[edit]

The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:44, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of anarchocapitalism section in anarchism, Sept 2008

[edit]

Please do not delete content simply because you disagree with it. Your deletion constitutes vandalism. Please refrain from such deletions in the future. Knight of BAAWA (talk) 22:28, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject France newsletter

[edit]
WikiProject France News

What's new?

[edit]
  • The project has recently experienced a complete redesign. The Outreach department has also undergone a major expansion, and this newsletter is the result of that.
  • The review department is currently under development, with several new proposals underway. Internal peer review had begun on the page of the project's Review Department. The department currently provides a centralized platform off all currently open reviews throughout the project (Featured Articles, Peer Reviews, Good Articles, Articles for Deletion, Categories for Discussion, etc.)
  • A new task force has been introduced: the Paris task force. Any users interested in contributing to the taskforce can join on the project page.
  • There is a current discussion about merging the French Communes WikiProject into ours. This communes project will be organised as a task force.
User-related news

Notifications

[edit]
Complete project tasks
Overview

This is the new project newsletter, covering months August through to October, which will contain information regarding new Good and Featured articles, recent project changes, general related news, and recent proposals.

If you've just joined, add your name to the Members section of Wikipedia:WikiProject France. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy!

Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the creation. Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!

Articles
  • Five articles are currently undergoing external peer reviews:
  1. Louvre Abu Dhabi
  2. Louvre
  3. Family Moving Day
  4. Napoleon I
  5. List of Bellflower Bunny Episodes
  • Two articles have reached GA status this month:
Newsletter contributors

Thanks for your contributions to the project, Jordan Contribs 17:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS Questionnaire

[edit]

As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:27, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spanishstar.gif listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Spanishstar.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 21:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Honecker.jpg)

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Honecker.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Tom (talk - email) 03:00, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Police raid protest april 20 06.jpg

[edit]

Hi Max rspct, I just have a question about the file File:Police raid protest april 20 06.jpg you uploaded. There is no description on its page, the source link doesn't work, and it looks like it's a screenshot from a TV show or video. That all looks pretty suspect, especially since it is an exceptional shot, the source is a website, and it was uploaded with a PD-self license. But luckily you're a frequent and current contributor, so I can ask you about it! If you have any details about when you filmed this, where it was, what was happening, etc. it would be great if you could add that to the image page. Thanks! - Gump Stump (talk) 16:26, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Max rspct. Could you answer the question above if you can? If you can't, I'll list the file for deletion in the next week or so. Thanks! - Gump Stump (talk) 03:25, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thälmann Island

[edit]

For that island being hoax, there are a lot of sources, referring to it, which can be found at the German Wikipedia entry: Thälmann Insel. That Thälmann Island was part of GDR is indeed doubtful, but the greatest sources against this are the governments of Germany and Cuba, which can't be seen as neutral in this concern. Toscho (talk) 09:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it partizan saying that? they are the only two govenments that are concerned with the issue and who could comment authoritively on it. Perhaps there's a maritime mapping agency or a subsection of the UN that could resolve the issue. Until then i wouldn't lose too much sleep over it. Having said that I would prefer the issue to be placed in an 'in popular culture' section though rather than in main body of text as it is detracts from the article and perhaps undermines the historical sovereignty of the GDR. ;) --maxrspct ping me 14:34, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Police raid protest april 20 06.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Police raid protest april 20 06.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. - Gump Stump (talk) 20:00, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe the file should be deleted simply based on suspicion. There should be an actual claim made by a supposed copyright holder. The image looks like it is from a cell phone and not a professional video, so there is every reason to believe the owner of the image uploaded it, unless another source or claim can be found. --Radical Mallard June 23, 2009, 5:55 PM EST
Hello, Max rspct. You have new messages at Rjanag's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Khachkar page

[edit]

I noticed your comment on the Khachkar talk page. I've started a RfC about the issues involved in the locking of the Khachkar article. Meowy 17:56, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment of Condoleezza Rice

[edit]

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Condoleezza Rice/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:17, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've listed this file for deletion on Commons. Please comment at the deletion discussion page if you can explain where the image came from and why it is licensed the way it is. Thanks! -Gump Stump (talk) 07:53, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, thanks for the editorial contributions.

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:14, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brainiak Records for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brainiak Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brainiak Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:37, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FOOD Needs You!

[edit]

Hi there Max rspct! I've noticed you have yourself listed as a member of the Food and Drink Wikiproject. Unfortunately it looks like the project has been slowly sliding into inactivity except for a couple of people. That makes me a sad potato, and nobody likes a sad potato amirite?

If you'd like to turn my frown upside down, can you do two small things?

First off, go here and add {{Tick}} (checkY) next to your name if you're still part of the project.

Second, go to the project talkpage and participate in a discussion about how to make the project more active, and how to go about making articles in our area of interest a lot better.

You don't want to make me cry, do you? Potatoes have a lot of eyes you know. So come on, join in! :)

— The Potato Hose 18:31, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter - September 2013

[edit]

WP:Food

[edit]

It would be appreciated if you joined in the conversation occurring at WT:Food regarding the layout and presentation of the project's main page. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:34, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revolutions of 1989 online Wikipedia challenge

[edit]

--Kippelboy (talk) 15:32, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter - October 2013

[edit]

October 2013

[edit]

Please stop re-inserting your comments into an AfD that was closed nearly a year ago, as you have at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brainiak Records. When a discussion is closed, comments are not to be added: if you believe the deletion was in error, you need to open a case at deletion review. Continually re-inserting comments into a closed discussion can be considered disruptive and edit-warring. - The Bushranger One ping only 17:26, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the rule on no more comments? Why can't you think up your own signature instead of lifting mine? I feel like putting in a complaint about your behaviour as an admin. -maxrspct ping me 19:14, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No signature was "lifted". The closed AfD says, in bold red text, "please do not modify". If you wish to complain that is your right however I'd suggest you read WP:BOOMERANG first. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:22, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. —The Bushranger One ping only 18:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:38, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Chevaline2.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chevaline2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Max rspct. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 10:18, 25 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 10:18, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Changed infobox at Commonwealth of England

[edit]

I've entirely changed the infobox at Commonwealth of England, as I don't think the previous one, designed for former countries, is appropriate. I'm just notifying you here, as I am technically edit warring, and have surpassed the 3 revert rule. If you would like to discuss the change, I will happily self-revert, and we can discuss at the article's talk page. Regards, Rob (talk | contribs) 21:49, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mimizan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gascogne and Henri II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

[edit]

Hi Max rspct! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:59, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User Box WP Japan

[edit]

Hi. I have a discussion up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Japan#Membership Roll? which concerns users who display {{User WikiProject Japan}} on their user page.

If I can get consensus, I would like to list you all under Category:WikiProject Japan participants. As of now, you will not be listed unless you switch to the other User box {{User WP Japan}}.

And if you really do not want to get listed, would you still mind switching to the other User box and use the feature that suppresses listing?
If you don't want to be listed, replace {{User WikiProject Japan}} with {{User WP Japan|nocat=true}}, or on your {{Babel}} replacing your |WikiProject Japan| with |special-boxes={{User WP Japan|nocat=true}}|
Thanks. --Kiyoweap (talk) 10:04, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Warriors of the Boer Nation for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Warriors of the Boer Nation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warriors of the Boer Nation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 05:12, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015 newsletter

[edit]

  – Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 23:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter – March 2016

[edit]

– Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 17:26, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter – April 2016

[edit]

– Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 17:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter (August 2016)

[edit]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter: September 2016

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:04, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and drink Newsletter: October 2016

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:47, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter: November 2016

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:28, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Max rspct. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Max rspct. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Culture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fourier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Federation graphic

[edit]

This here edit you made: [1] – misleading how? Just out of interest. Damvile (talk) 03:51, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That there graphic doesn't explain why it's coloured differently. It gives the impression that the UK is already out of the EU. If you want to put 'pending' in there on both the graphic and displayed version box then please do and it would be fine. I know it's on the image page descriptor but that is not evident to the reader unless they click through and scroll down. maxrspct ping me 03:57, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I see your point; thanks! Damvile (talk) 04:04, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Genetic history of Europe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Marx-citizenship.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Marx-citizenship.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:10, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Max rspct. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]