Talk:Pearson correlation coefficient

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pearson correlation coefficient article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 3 months

Statistics Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Mathematics Mid‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-priority on the project's priority scale.

Pronunciation

The article presently says that the pronunciation of "Pearson" is /ˈpɪərsən/. This is surely incorrect. In my dialect, the natural way to say it would be more like /ˈp[invalid input: 'iəɹ']sən/, where the first schwa is debatable; notice the change to the first vowel and the rhotic. Indeed, this is how I have heard it pronounced throughout my personal experience.

Can we get a citation on the proper pronunciation or something? IbexNu (talk) 23:45, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concur. I would just "edit aggressively", in good WP fashion, if I were you, IbexNu. Jmacwiki (talk) 20:18, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong standard error formula

The formula given is wrong. There should be no square root over 1-r^2. This can be seen from the sources given Bowley, A. L. (1928). "The Standard Deviation of the Correlation Coefficient". Journal of the American Statistical Association. 23 (161): 31–34. doi:10.2307/2277400. ISSN 0162-1459. JSTOR 2277400. "Derivation of the standard error for Pearson's correlation coefficient". Cross Validated. Retrieved 30 July 2021. 95.104.184.242 (talk) 04:57, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]